Compliance/EU AI Act/Cybersecurity
EU AI Act compliance for Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity AI typically isn't itself high-risk under Annex III, but value-chain responsibilities (Art. 25) + GPAI obligations (Art. 53 when using foundation models) apply. Sales into regulated customers cascades evidence demands.
What applies
Articles + provisions of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Artificial Intelligence Act most directly engaged by Cybersecurity deployments:
- Art. 25
- Art. 53
What this looks like in Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity AI typically isn't itself high-risk under Annex III, but value-chain responsibilities (Art. 25) + GPAI obligations (Art. 53 when using foundation models) apply. Sales into regulated customers cascades evidence demands.
Flagship exampleCybersecurity vendor selling into NIS2 essential entities: customers ask for AI-decisioning evidence as part of their supply-chain assessment.
Where Promethean's evidence layer fits
The substrate emits specific evidence kinds that map to EU AI Act obligations. Most directly relevant for Cybersecurity:
For the full sector view including LLM-feature catalogue, tier recommendation, and reviewer-gate examples, see the Cybersecurity sector page.
Adjacent cells
Same regulation, other sectors
- EU AI Act × Fintech & Payments
- EU AI Act × Healthtech
- EU AI Act × HR Tech & Recruiting
- EU AI Act × InsurTech
- EU AI Act × EdTech
- EU AI Act × LegalTech
- EU AI Act × Govtech & Public Sector
- EU AI Act × PropTech & Real Estate
- EU AI Act × AdTech & Marketing
- EU AI Act × Customer Support SaaS
- EU AI Act × Energy & Utilities
Other regulations for Cybersecurity